Skip to main content
idfg-badge

Idaho Fish and Game

Salmon Fly Perched on the finger of an angler

Does boat electrofishing harm aquatic insects?

idfg-staff

By Josh Clark, IDFG Fisheries Technician and BYU-Idaho Fisheries Student

In an effort to reduce the population of non-native rainbow trout and benefit native Yellowstone cutthroat trout in the South Fork Snake River, Idaho Fish and Game has used boat electrofishing — a fish sampling technique that temporally stuns fish by applying electrical current to the waterway. This technique is used to capture and relocate rainbow trout from the South Fork to other waters where rainbow trout make fishing better without impacting native species. 

Electrofishing efforts have been met with some controversy from the angling public. A public meeting was held by Fish and Game in the spring of 2023 to address the concerns. During the meeting, a member of the public questioned whether these electrofishing efforts have had a negative impact on aquatic insect populations. While a few studies have researched impacts of backpack electrofishing on aquatic insects, we are not aware of published articles investigating impacts of boat-based electrofishing. Stable aquatic insect populations are vital to maintain a healthy fishery, so Idaho Fish and Game in collaboration with BYU-Idaho studied whether jetboat and raft electrofishing increased the rate in which aquatic insects are disturbed from the riverbed (drift rate) and insect mortality.

Image 2. An electrofishing raft passing in front of a set of drift nets during the electrofishing survey of the Henrys Fork Snake River.
Image 2. An electrofishing raft passing in front of a set of drift nets during the electrofishing survey of the Henrys Fork Snake River.

To determine if boat electrofishing causes an increase in aquatic insect drift rate, we used a series of drift nets to sample three electrofishing sites. Sites were selected to overlap with Fish and Game's 2024 boat electrofishing population estimates of both the Henrys Fork Snake River and the South Fork Snake River. At each site, we calculated the average number of insects drifting at three distinct times: four days before electrofishing occurred, during electrofishing efforts, and three days after electrofishing. 

We then compared the drift rates of each sample time at each site. Comparing insect drift rates before, during, and after electrofishing allowed us to establish a baseline drift rate and determine if electrofishing increased drift rates the day of electrofishing and three days after electrofishing. 

To determine if boat electrofishing causes mortality of aquatic insects, we used kick nets to collect a sample of forty hydropsychid caddisflies and forty perlid stoneflies (Image 1). We separated each group of 40 insects into two groups of 20 with half as a control group and the other half as the test group. 

Image 1.  A group of Perlid Stoneflies in a collection tray after they had been collected via kicknets.
Image 1.  A group of Perlid Stoneflies in a collection tray after they had been collected via kicknets.

The control group insects were not exposed to electrofishing and served as a baseline to compare survival rates to the test group that was exposed to electrofishing. While the control groups were placed into an aerated cooler, the test groups were placed into a temporary trap in the South Fork Snake River. The test groups were then exposed to a single jetboat electrofishing pass. All insects were transported to BYU-Idaho and randomly assigned to tanks in a recirculating rearing chamber (Image 3). For three days, we monitored all insects and checked for mortalities every 10-12 hours.

Image 3. The recirculating rearing chamber on the campus of BYU-Idaho. This rearing chamber was used to house Perlid Stoneflies and Hydropsychid Caddisflies for seventy-two hours after electrofishing the South Fork Snake River.
Image 3. The recirculating rearing chamber on the campus of BYU-Idaho. This rearing chamber was used to house Perlid Stoneflies and Hydropsychid Caddisflies for seventy-two hours after electrofishing the South Fork Snake River.

At each of the three electrofishing sites, we compared the average rate of drifting insects between the three sample times: before, during, and after electrofishing. We found no significant difference in insect drift rates between sample times at either of the three electrofishing sites (Figure 1). Our findings show no impact on aquatic insect drift rates attributable to raft and jet boat electrofishing. 

Figure 1. The average number of drifting insects per cubic meter of water at the upstream Henry's Fork electrofishing site with 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 1. The average number of drifting insects per cubic meter of water at the upstream Henry's Fork electrofishing site with 95% confidence intervals.

Seventy-two hours after electrofishing occurred, we compared the death rates of caddisflies and stoneflies exposed to electrofishing (test group) to caddisflies and stoneflies that were not exposed to electrofishing (control group) (Figure 2). We found no significant difference in mortality rates between the test and control groups. These findings indicate that electrofishing does not cause an increase in the death of aquatic insects used in our study. 

After studying the effects of raft and jetboat electrofishing on aquatic insects, we found no effects on aquatic insect drift rates or mortality caused by electrofishing. Our findings indicate raft and jetboat electrofishing on Idaho’s waterways is not only an efficient means of capturing fish for sampling and management purposes, but has limited negative impacts on important aquatic insects that support our fish populations. 

Figure 2. The percentage of Perlid Stoneflies surviving over seventy-two hours after electrofishing on the South Fork Snake River.
Figure 2. The percentage of Perlid Stoneflies surviving over seventy-two hours after electrofishing on the South Fork Snake River.