Mule deer survival over this past winter promises to be better than average. Mule deer populations require good overwinter survival of does and fawns, and a high doe:fawn ratio going into winter. The quality of habitat, particularly summer habitat in conjunction with winter severity drive mule deer population growth.
Mule Deer Fawn Mortality Summary | ||||
April 30, 2013 | ||||
Study Does | Total Dead | % Mortality | ||
Weiser-McCall | 32 | 11 | 34% | |
Central Mountains | 37 | 18 | 49% | |
Mountain Valley | 38 | 21 | 55% | |
Boise River | 23 | 7 | 30% | |
Smoky-Bennett | 35 | 5 | 14% | |
South Hills | 20 | 7 | 35% | |
Bannock | 0 | |||
Caribou | 0 | |||
Palisades | 0 | |||
Island Park | 0 | |||
Total | 185 | 69 | 37% |
Mule Deer Doe Mortality Summary | ||||
April 30, 2013 | ||||
Study Does | Total Dead | % Mortality | ||
Lower Salmon | 11 | 0 | 0% | |
Weiser-McCall | 39 | 0 | 0% | |
Middle Fork | 26 | 0 | 0% | |
Central Mountains | 84 | 6 | 7% | |
Mountain Valley | 52 | 4 | 8% | |
Boise River | 47 | 4 | 9% | |
Smoky-Bennett | 56 | 1 | 2% | |
South Hills | 48 | 4 | 8% | |
Bannock | 54 | 4 | 7% | |
Caribou | 26 | 1 | 4% | |
Palisades | 17 | 1 | 6% | |
Island Park | 28 | 1 | 4% | |
Total | 488 | 26 | 5% |