Publication Type:
Journal ArticleSource:
North American Journal of Fisheries Management, American Fisheries Society, Volume 35, Issue 1, p.31-53 (2015)Call Number:
A15MUH01IDUSKeywords:
Inland Columbia Basin Redband Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri, SWAPAbstract:
In this article the authors describe the current status and conservation of interior (potamodromous) Redband Trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss sspp., throughout its range in the western United States using extant data and expert opinion provided by fish managers. Redband trout historically occupied 60,295 km of stream habitat and 152 natural lakes. Currently, redband trout occupy 25,417 km of stream habitat (42% of their historical range) and 124 lakes or reservoirs. Nonhybridized populations are assumed to occupy 11,695 km (46%) of currently occupied streams; however, fish from only 4,473 km (18%) have been genetically tested. Approximately 47% of the streams occupied by redband trout occur on private land, 45% on government lands, and 8% in protected areas. A total of 210 redband trout populations, occupying 15,252 km of stream habitat (60% of the current distribution) and 95,158 ha of lake habitat (52%), are being managed as “conservation populations.” Most conservation populations have been designated as weakly to strongly connected metapopulations (125; 60%) and occupy much more stream length (14,112 km; 93%) than isolated conservation populations (1,141 km; 7%). The primary threats to redband trout include invasive species, habitat degradation and fragmentation, and climate change. Although the historical distribution of interior redband trout has declined dramatically, the authors conclude that the species is not currently at imminent risk of extinction because it is still widely distributed with many populations isolated by physical barriers, and active conservation efforts are occurring for many populations. However, the hybridization status of many populations has not been well quantified, and introgression may be more prevalent than documented here. The authors recommend 1) collecting additional genetic data and estimating distribution and abundance by means of a more rigorous spatial sampling design to reduce uncertainties, 2) collecting additional information to assess and predict the impacts of climate on populations, and 3) continuing to use this database to evaluate the status of redband trout and inform conservation efforts through time.
Notes:
ELECTRONIC FILE - Zoology: Fishes
Recommended citation: Clint C. Muhlfeld, Shannon E. Albeke, Stephanie L. Gunckel, Benjamin J. Writer, Bradley B. Shepard & Bruce E. May (2015) Status and Conservation of Interior Redband Trout in the Western United States, North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 35:1, 31-53, DOI: 10.1080/02755947.2014.951807.
SWAP (2/19/2016) citation:
Muhlfeld CC, Albeke SE, Gunckel SL, Writer BJ, Shepard BB, May BE. 2015. Status and conservation of interior redband trout in the western United States. [accessed 2015 Jul 1]; North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 35(1):31–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02755947.2014.951807