Greater sage‐grouse and fences: Does marking reduce collisions?

Publication Type:

Journal Article

Source:

Wildlife Society Bulletin, The Wildlife Society, Volume 36, Issue 2, p.297-303 (2012)

Call Number:

A12STE02IDUS

URL:

http://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Stevens_Marking-ReduceCollisions-2.pdf

Keywords:

Centrocercus urophasianus, fence management, Greater Sage-Grouse, SWAP

Abstract:

Collision with infrastructure such as fences is widespread and common for many species of grouse. Greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) fence-collision has been documented and fence-marking methods have been recommended for mitigating prairie-grouse collision in rangeland habitats. We tested a marking method in greater sage-grouse breeding habitat and modeled collision as a function of fence marking and control covariates, in Idaho (USA) in 2010. Our results suggested collision risk decreased with fence marking, increased with lek-count indices of local abundance, and decreased with increasing distance from lek. We found an approximate 83% reduction in collision rates at marked fences relative to unmarked fences. Our results also suggested marking may not be necessary on all fences, and mitigation should focus on areas with locally abundant grouse populations and fence segments <2 km from known leks. Nonetheless, collision still occurred at marked fences <500 m from large leks, and moving or removing fences may be necessary in some areas if management is to eliminate collision.

Notes:

ELECTRONIC FILE - Zoology: Birds

SWAP (2/19/2016) citation [with minor change]:
Stevens BS, Reese KP, Connelly JW, Musil DD. 2012. Greater sage‐grouse and fences: Does marking reduce collisions? [accessed 2015 Dec 22]; Wildlife Society Bulletin. 36(2):297–303. http://www.sagegrouseinitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Stevens_M...